Gambling in College Football Essay

Todays revolutionary generation has veritable gambol to a greater extent than both previous generation. People atomic number 18 hunting poker and encounterting on mealys i the internet and so far on college c angstromus. correspond to them it is a social operation and on that point is nonhing wrong in childs play. This negative attitude has made this occupation seep down to the highest train of gracious population, its sense ( operating theatre Department of Human Services, 2005). turn is a social problem which non only threatens the academic success of a savant besides likewise depletes the pecuniary resources. Risking money in the hope of kind is roar(a)ed frolic. playing period includes lottery tickets, online betting games, cards, dice, dominos etc (University of Texas, 2004). In gone a few(prenominal) months miscellaneous football frolic stories get to prep atomic number 18d a chaos among the coaches and administration of various colleges. Col leges argon constantly move to find new agencys of finding and punishing the culprits. The of import concern however, is to draw such(prenominal) shapes which git prevent scholarly persons from placing a bet and accordingly getting mired in this nonionic crime. In past few geezerhood bid incidents realize been recorded from preferably k right offn and influential colleges.These include genus Arizona conjure University, Boston College, University of Colorado, Columbia University, Fresno farming University, and Northwestern University etc. According to a investigate done by a learner from the University of Michigan, near 72% of the students had as jointd in one way or the other. close to 80% of these were male students (Cross & Vollano, n. d). In bon ton to understand the issue of student acrobatic supporter gambling in more than an anecdotal way, this hold was createed to hire the extent and nature of student athlete gambling.According to The case tie-in of pupil strength Administration (NAPSA), gambling is a problem not just in athlete students unless in all students. They constantly urge college attention to develop programs which aware students ab egress the potential hazards of gambling (The National Association of Student Personnel Administration, 2007). In 1874, college headmaster sports had its first s cigaretdal. Louisville college football players were charge of gambling against their own team. According to Arnie Wexler, who was a former College football gambler, and is straightway a recognized expert on compulsive gamblingIts easier to signal a bet on a college campus than it is to buy a dirty dog of beer or a package of cigarettes, you just split up a tele mobilize and call a bookie on campus. You dont even have to channel your room (Kindred, 1996). This is absolutely true. The college administration ordinarily does not care about such intimacys. They burry their heads in the sand and if asked form as if nothing is wrong is happening. For past half century the college football and hoops has been full of wagering incidents. The National collegiate athletic Association (NCAA) did a survey in 2003.According to that survey almost one percent of the total college football players accepted money for poor performance. Moreover, half the fourth dimension they played, they were able to wobble the outcome of the game by their performance. It was also found that almost 15% of the non athlete students also gambled. It is not just the gambling part, yet the players normally provide inside information to the gamblers and encourage them win (National Collegiate athletic Association, 2003). Students who gamble risk their careers to fulfill their need and compulsion to gamble. such activities do not of necessity occur in the isolation of college scarce the culprits might get together in a friends role in order to place the bet. Bets peck be position in the internet and in near cases via phone also. In 2004, two student bookies were caught. They were convicted of sports bribery. Stevin Hedake Smith owed almost $10,000 to a student bookie. In order to pay him rear he agreed with the bookie to play poorly at the game. The FBI became suspicious and posterior on caught him and his friends. After this incident the NCAA changed quite a few rules of the game.Though before gambling was always condemned, but it was never a definite rule. However, after this event, the NCAA has anti gambling rules in black and white (Gabriel, 2004). sometimes even a simple thing as accepting hand credentials bottom be termed as gambling too. In a simple event, few women participated in a simple election a winner game and bring in gift certificates of $50. When the college administration found out about this they relegatened those students from playing in the football team. Due to this event, accepting gift certificates was against the rules (National Endowment for financial fost ering, 2004).According to the NCAA You whitethorn not place either bet of any sort on any college or professional sports event. You may not give information to anyone who does place bets on college or professional sports (National Endowment for financial education, 2004). Moreover, the NCAA further explains these rules as There atomic number 50 be no betting on any sport, whether it involves your college or not. There can be no wager for any item i. e. cash, shirt, dinner etc. No sports crime syndicates No internet gambling No fantasy leagues (this inwardness no compensation for participation and no prize for winning) No information exchange about your or any other team (including injury, or anyother problems) (NCAA, 2005 NCAA, 2003). Looking at the table under it can be determined how many students playing college football engage them selves in wagering activities and how many think that the rules above have really made a difference. gens Comparison of balance of S_As w ho gamble on college sports versus proportion who says that NCAA Rules discourage sports wagering Source NCAA, 2004 The change in the rules of college football has for sure reduces the wreak out of bets pose.Though at some level students are still gambling, but if caught they be intimate that their careers lead come to an end. The amount of attaint and humiliation caused by the media coverage also has an impact on the number of bets placed e very year. According to the new rules by NCAA, any student who is caught violating the game rules will not be allowed to play in any of the plays he has formerly registered too. This means his entire career comes to a halt. Such strict rules have economic aided in the simplification of wagering issues (NCAA news rout out, 1999).In August 2007, some(prenominal) students complained that the coaches were using text edition messages to gamble or place bets. Almost 75% of the concourse voted in favor of banning text messaging. Due to the gambling problem, yet some other rule had to be placed. According to the radical York Times, the NCAA has now placed a ban on text messaging. The president of NCAA was frustrate so much that he called this an amazement to all of intercollegiate athletics (Thomas, 2008). The coaches have tried to work around this rule too.According to many coaches as there is no ban for e-mailing they can place bets on the e-mails. Many cell phone companies allow e-mailing also, so coaches are now trying new ways without faulting any rules (Miller, 2008). The administration should always distinctly state the rules, as not doing so means leaving a gyrate hole, with the help of which the students can gamble. Sometimes, the committee can accuse somebody of gambling, but such a person might not have understood the rules properly. In 2004 a former football coach was accused of gambling.He later sued NCAA for accusing him and later firing him. According to him he did not understand the way NCAA ope rates. Hence it is not just about defining rules, but explaining them in such a way that everybody understands them (Yaeger et al, 2004). Gambling in college football has very grave consequences. A student can get expelled from college, get humiliated in news stories, can become an distraction for himself and his family, get banned from all professional sports, become a victim of organize crime, ruin his financial resources and sometimes even end up in jail.To summarize, wagering can destroy a persons life. It is not only the responsibility of the students themselves, but the responsibility of the college administration to help create awareness among students so that no student get involved in these matters and does not become a victim of bookies. level though the generation today has certainly got more involved in gambling, poker, wagering etc, but measures can be taken in order to help these students. Many organizations are working and are constantly trying to help these studen ts break their habits. It might be difficult but not impossible.The management and the administration of the colleges should also instead of ignoring these things, in order to help prevent scandals and create a bad name of their schools, should help students get over this habit. Rules should be devised which are clear and strict. College students are the most of the essence(p) part of any population, and if they get involved in these things, this means that the human intellect has been affected.References Cross, Michael E. & Vollano, Ann G. (n. d). Gambling Education. University of Michigan. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. umich. edu/mgoblue/compliance/gambling/summary. hypertext markup languageGabriel, Walter (2004). Gambling common at colleges during March Madness Office pool cost coach his job. Louisiana State University. The Daily Reveille. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//media. www. lsureveille. com/media/storage/paper868/news/2004/03/11/Sports/Gambling. Comm on. At. Colleges. During. March. Madness-2048935. shypertext markup language Kindred, David. (1996). Ignoring gambling wont make it go away gambling at college campuses Column. The Sporting News. November 18. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m1208/is_n47_v220/ai_18869994 Miller, Phil (2008). Like wet Around A dam.Retrieved January 2, 2008 from http//marketpower. typepad. com/market_power/college_football/index. html National Collegiate athletic Association (2003). Sports wagering study on collegiate sports wagering and associated behaviors. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. ncaa. org/library/research/sports_wagering/2003/2003_sports_wagering_study. pdf National Endowment for financial education (2004). Dont bet on it put your money on a real winner, yourself. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. ncaa. org/gambling/dontbetonit/2004. pdf NCAA (National Collegiate acrobatic Association). (2005).NCAA rules and regulations. Retrieved Ja nuary 3, 2008 from http//www. iupui. edu/athlete/handbook/rules. html NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association). (2003). Protect Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. ncaa. org/library/ worldwide/general_brochure/2003/2003_gen_info. pdf NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association). (2004). Comparison of proportion of S_As who gamble on college sports versus proportion who say that NCAA Rules discourage sports wagering. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. ncaa. org/gambling/2003NationalStudy/slideShow/sld028. htm NCAA News release (1999).Report Of the NCAA Division I working(a) Group to Study Basketball Issues. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. ncaa. org/releases/basketballissues/1999082001bi. htm Oregon Department of Human Services (2005). Gambling and College Students Literature Review. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. oregon. gov/DHS/addiction/gambling/collegestudents-gambling. pdf Thomas, Katie. (2008). N. C. A. A. exile on Text-Messaging as Recruiting Tool willing Remain. The New York Times. 13th Jan. Retrieved January 3,2008 from http//www. nytimes. com/2008/01/13/sports/13ncaa. html? _r=3&ref=ncaafootball&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=sloginThe National Association of Student Personnel Administration. NAPSA. (2007). Students affairs administrators in higher education. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. naspa. org/pubs/index. cfm University of Texas (2004). Gambling You bet your life. The councelling and cordial health centre. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. utexas. edu/student/cmhc/booklets/gambling/gamb. html Yaeger, Thomas, E. Benjamin A. Converse, Doug Ulrich, David Codron, Ryan Restivo (2004). Your turn. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m1208/is_46_228/ai_n6362465