Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee - 1475 Words

To Kill A Mockingbird; Licked Before You Begin It is the 1930s in a small town in Alabama, Maycomb County to be specific. The Great Depression is in full swing, people are dirt poor, slavery is abolished but segregation is not. â€Å" To Kill a Mockingbird † written by Harper Lee is a fictional book, nevertheless it takes the reader through a journey of truth, justice and courage. In the story we met Atticus Finch a lawyer for the fine town folk of Maycomb County and perhaps the towns true moral compass. Through the narrative of the story by his daughter Scout, we see the true value of what one man can do. In everyday life there will be defining moments that will test your character and which side of the fence you stand on. Courage†¦show more content†¦He also shares with Jem, â€Å"Courage is when you know you’re licked before you begin, but you begin anyway and see it through no matter what† (149). Atticus is telling his children to realize courage is not only holding a gun or using your fists. That there are other types of courage much stronger than guns like facing emotional and physical pain. As with Mrs Dubose, sure she was an old lady with a spiteful tongue, â€Å"Not only a Finch waiting on tables but one in the court house lawing for nigger!† (135). Mrs. Dubose was dying and she was addicted to morphine. Jem’s outburst was her gain, yes he destroyed her property but Atticus needed Jem to see why she was so miserable. After she passed away, Atticus shared with his children that Mrs. Dubose had the courage to go off the morphine, to die on her own terms. Jem’s attack on her camellia bushes in pure frustration of how she talked to them was truly, her gain. As punishment Jem had to go and read to her and that was the time she withdrew from her addiction. Jem actually help her more than he knew and Atticus needed Jem to see her courage and to accept why she said the things she did. Sure Atticus was not equipped to teach Scout etiquette or play tackle football like younger fathers and maybe at the time it was not your typical childhood up bringing. However Atticus was teaching his children lessons in life that would support them in the future and making them amazing individuals.Show MoreRelatedKill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee1049 Words   |  5 PagesTo Kill a Mockingbird: How a Story could be based on True Events in Everyday LifeDaisy GaskinsCoastal Pines Technical Collegeâ€Æ'Harper Lee was born in Monroeville, Alabama. Her father was a former newspaper editor and proprietor, who had served as a state senator and practiced as a lawyer in Monroeville. Also Finch was known as the maiden name of Lee’s mother. With that being said Harper Lee became a writer like her father, bu t she became a American writer, famous for her race relations novel â€Å"ToRead MoreTo Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee1000 Words   |  4 Pagesworld-wide recognition to the many faces of prejudice is an accomplishment of its own. Author Harper Lee has had the honor to accomplish just that through her novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, a moving and inspirational story about a young girl learning the difference between the good and the bad of the world. In the small town of Monroeville, Alabama, Nelle Harper Lee was born on April 28, 1926. Growing up, Harper Lee had three siblings: two sisters and an older brother. She and her siblings grew up modestlyRead MoreKill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee1290 Words   |  6 PagesHarper Lee published To Kill a Mockingbird during a rough period in American history, also known as the Civil Rights Movement. This plot dives into the social issues faced by African-Americans in the south, like Tom Robinson. Lee felt that the unfair treatment towards bl acks were persistent, not coming to an end any time in the foreseeable future. This dark movement drove her to publish this novel hopeful that it would encourage the society to realize that the harsh racism must stop. Lee effectivelyRead MoreKill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee873 Words   |  4 PagesIn the book, To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee illustrates that â€Å"it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird† throughout the novel by writing innocent characters that have been harmed by evil. Tom Robinson’s persecution is a symbol for the death of a mockingbird. The hunters shooting the bird would in this case be the Maycomb County folk. Lee sets the time in the story in the early 1950s, when the Great Depression was going on and there was poverty everywhere. The mindset of people back then was that blackRead MoreKill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee963 Words   |  4 Pagesgrowing up, when older characters give advice to children or siblings.Growing up is used frequently in t he novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Harper Lee uses the theme growing up in To Kill a Mockingbird to change characters opinion, develop characters through their world, and utilizes prejudice to reveal growing up. One major cause growing up is used in To Kill a Mockingbird is to represent a change of opinion. One part growing up was shown in is through the trial in part two of the novelRead MoreKill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee1052 Words   |  5 PagesTo Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee takes place in Maycomb County, Alabama in the late 30s early 40s , after the great depression when poverty and unemployment were widespread throughout the United States. Why is the preconception of racism, discrimination, and antagonism so highly related to some of the characters in this book? People often have a preconceived idea or are biased about one’s decision to live, dress, or talk. Throughout To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee examines the preconceptionRead MoreHarper Lee and to Kill a Mockingbird931 Words   |  4 PagesHarper Lee and her Works Harper Lee knew first hand about the life in the south in the 1930s. She was born in Monroeville, Alabama in 1926 (Castleman 2). Harper Lee was described by one of her friends as Queen of the Tomboys (Castleman 3). Scout Finch, the main character of Lees Novel, To Kill a Mockinbird, was also a tomboy. Many aspects of To Kill a Mockingbird are autobiographical (Castleman 3). Harper Lees parents were Amasa Coleman Lee and Frances Finch Lee. She was the youngestRead MoreKill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee1695 Words   |  7 PagesIn To Kill a Mockingbird Harper Lee presents as a ‘tired old town’ where the inhabitants have ‘nowhere to go’ it is set in the 1930s when prejudices and racism were at a peak. Lee uses Maycomb town to highlight prejudices, racism, poverty and social inequality. In chapter 2 Lee presents the town of Maycomb to be poverty stricken, emphasised through the characterisation of Walter Cunningham. When it is discovered he has no lunch on the first day of school, Scout tries to explain the situation to MissRead MoreKill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee1876 Words   |  8 PagesThough Harper Lee only published two novels, her accomplishments are abundant. Throughout her career Lee claimed: the Presidential Medal of Freedom, Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, Goodreads Choice Awards Best Fiction, and Quill Award for Audio Book. Lee was also inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Letters. This honor society is a huge accomplishment and is considered the highest recognition for artistic talent and accomplishment in the United States. Along with these accomplishments, herRead MoreKill A Mockingbird, By Harper Lee1197 Words   |  5 Pagessuch as crops, houses, and land, and money was awfully limited. These conflicts construct Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mocking Bird. In To Kill a Mocking Bird, Lee establishes the concurrence of good and evil, meaning whether people are naturally good or naturally evil. Lee uses symbolism, characterization, and plot to portray the instinctive of good and evil. To Kill a Mocking Bird, a novel by Harper Lee takes place during the 1930s in the Southern United States. The protagonist, Scout Finch,

A Summary, Analysis and Discussion of Søren Kierkegaard,...

A summary, analysis and discussion of Sà ¸ren Kierkegaard, Training in Christianity[1] I. Introduction In this essay, I will try to summarize, analyze and discuss several pages of Sà ¸ren Kierkegaard’s Training in Christianity. I will try to focus on his approach to sacred history, a general Christian history and Christianity, which he discusses in this work in relation to faith in God. In other parts of this essay I will attempt also to relate these pages of his work to some key ideas of Kierkegaard’s theology and philosophy and support this with some concrete quotations from the text. In the end I will very briefly compare different philosophies of Hegel and Kierkegaard and try to relate Kierkegaard’s work to a few topics, which†¦show more content†¦Christian has according to Kierkegaard nothing to learn from general history, teaching Christian history in schools is therefore pointless. ‘[†¦] true Christians [†¦] have nothing to do with Christians of former generations, but everything to do with contemporary Christ.’[9] So does t he history of Christianity of over 1800 years in Kierkegaard’s time (over 2000 in ours) have any significance at all? To this question would Kierkegaard probably give answer: ‘No’, as he gives answers to few similar questions he asks himself. Firstly, he tries to give answer on question whether Jesus is always the same or he has changed in history and whether we can learn anything about him from history. To this question Kierkegaard responds: ‘Yes, He is the same yesterday and today.’[10] Therefore we can not learn anything new about him from history; we can know him only from sacred history. This means we can know God only as humbled, as ‘lowly one,’[11] but never as the one, who is in glory and who will in glory come. ‘about His coming again nothing can be known; in the strictest sense, it can only be believed.’[12] Secondly, Kierkegaard asks himself, if one can prove from history that Christ was God. Here he answers: No. He argues that it is impossible to prove this using reason, because we can only prove that something is against reason andShow MoreRelatedDat Based On The Information Given From The Book1686 Words   |  7 PagesPhilosophy and Religious Studies at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Stanley J. Grenz, on the other hand, is a Pioneer McDonald Professor at Carey Theological College, Vancouver, British Columbia. He is a former student of Miller’s. Stanley had his trainings in various parts of the world. He preached and gave lectures at churches, colleges, universities, and seminaries in North America, Europe, Africa, Australia, and Asia. Stanley also served in gospel ministry. Author and credentials: Ed L. Miller

Views on the Best Life free essay sample

According to Epicurus, by understanding the physical causes of strange natural occurrences (like eclipses, earthquakes, tsunamis etc), we can overcome fears that many believe the gods send. One way to achieve happiness is to eliminate fear of the unknown, and fear of these natural occurrences. Physics is an area of science that works to explain the cause of these things, and the key to living a happier life relies on a better understanding of this science, as well as other areas such as meteorology. How can we be happy if we constantly worry about things we have no control over? Epicurus states this in his principal doctrine: â€Å"It is not possible for a man to banish all fear of the essential questions of life unless he understands the nature of the universe, and unless he banishes all consideration that the fables told about the universe could be true. Therefore a man cannot enjoy full happiness, untroubled by turmoil, unless he acts to gain knowledge of the nature of things. We will write a custom essay sample on Views on the Best Life or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page † (Epicurus 12)Knowing why Epicurus put so much emphasis on sensory knowledge is important to understand if we want to achieve a happier life, and a life of pleasure. The concept of knowledge not only depends on life experience but also on truths of life experience, in other words our senses must be proven to be true. Understanding physical pain through an examination of the way in which nature works helps us to understand that the majority of our suffering is unnecessary and self-created. Intense physical pain is typically short lived, while a long-term pain is typically mild. Prolonged periods of intense pain are rare for most of us. Epicurus thought that a detailed understanding of the physical world would help to improve our lives as well as understanding the causes and effects of pain and suffering. Another area of focus is his concept of not fearing death. Scientific studies help to remove the fear of death by teaching that the mind and spirit are material and mortal, so they cannot live on after death. In order to understand what happens when one dies, we must understand the scientific aspect that the world consists of nothing more than the atoms of the void; invisible, indestructible pieces of ‘stuff’. Everything in the world is composed of them. There is such a thing as a human soul, but it is a thing that is composed of very fine atoms that are also the roots of sensation. Death is the dissolution of the soul, and is capable of becoming decomposed. In contrast to Epicurus’ views that stress sensory knowledge in achieving a life of pleasure, Plato thought that knowledge gained from the senses is not as important as knowledge gained through philosophical reasoning. The allegory of the cave shows a comparison between people who see shadows and mistake them for the truth, and those who really do see the truth. To summarize the main theme of the Allegory of the Cave, We are deceived by our senses. Because we trust these senses, we are like prisoners in a cave, mistaking the shadows on the wall for reality. Additionally, Socrates felt that an important thing for us to inquire into in order to pursue the best life is knowledge. He spent most of his life searching for the truths that make up nowledge, and he believed that the senses were an obstacle in ones search for knowledge. Epicurus believed that relying on the senses were pivotal in achieving happiness, while Socrates believed that a good soul was pivotal in achieving happiness. Socrates also believed that the body was imperfect, while the soul is perfect in relation to the real world. Epicurus and Plato also had opposing approaches to knowledge. Epicurus favored materialism, which is the view that everything is matter in motion, and knowledge depends on physical processes and sensation, not just reason. Epicurus also believed we obtained knowledge only through observation of the senses, and that sensations corresponded to an existing thing, which must be tested against the knowledge of the world. He also did not believe life existed after death, and unlike Plato’s view, we do not possess any knowledge prior to birth. Plato favored idealism, which states that reality is mental, and immaterial, and specifically relates to the mind, and knowledge could not be obtained by only relying on our senses. Plato elieved that we learn in this life by remembering knowledge that we learned in a previous life, and that the soul already has all knowledge, and we also learn by remembering what the soul already knows. What is the possibility of combining these two approaches? Is it possible to bring them together in order to achieve the best life? Using Socrates views in The Allegory of the Cave, knowledge is knowing what you do not know, not what you know, and Epicurus’ view that senso ry knowledge is the fundamental basis of all knowledge, I do believe both approaches can be combined to achieve the best possible life. I believe that there is continuity among our mind, body, and the environment, and we can learn more by encompassing all three of these entities. By relying strictly on our senses I don’t think we would gain the knowledge necessary to survive in the modern world. But combining materialism and idealism would allow us to live the best life possible. Works Cited Epicurus. The â€Å"Principle Doctrines†; http://www. epicurus. net/en/principal. html

Past and Future- English Argumentative free essay sample

There is no point in preserving the past. We should be looking to the future. Do you agree with this statement? Seperating past, present and future is a mistake many people tend to make. The past, present and future are entwined in each other, and most apparently, the past is deeply embedded in the future. Often, youngsters feel that the past is unimportant, and that we ought to be looking to the future. This is a deadly, fatal, and extremely misguided way of thinking; are they even thinking at all? History teaches us many valuable lessons in life, for our time and the future generations to come. Harsh, unreasonable demands and unfair terms in the Treaty of Versailles France and Britain forced Germany to accept was one of the main causes for the rise of the Nazi party, and the start of World War II. This caused devastation to the whole of Europe, and much of America and Asia. We will write a custom essay sample on Past and Future- English Argumentative or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Subsequent political leaders take this as a warning from the past, and now there are committees and organisations set up to ensure that countries are not forced to accept unreasonable and unfair terms in treaties, such as the United Nations. However, if leaders do not keep this warning in mind, history may repeat itself. For example, if the United States invasion of Iraq caused them too much hardship and suffering, extremist groups and terrorists could be even more incensed and gain even greater support from their countrymates. This would be dreadful for the entire world, especially in light of increased globalisation. The collapse of one country would have far greater impacts now on the rest of the world than in 1939. Thus, leaders must be careful not to ignore forewarnings from the past in their decisions affecting the future. Another example of the past being inseperable from the future would be economics. In the economic history of the Great Depression, economists warned that one of the causes was the large-scale corporate thimblerigging that was going on, meaning the fact that banks invested great amounts of money in stocks. One investment house sold nearly a billion dollars worth of securities in three investment trusts, all of which depreciated eventually to nothing. Thus, in 1971, the Glass-Steagall Act was passed, banning commercial banks from entering the investment banking business, either directly or indirectly. The reasons Congress had in mind when passing the act proved prophetic three decades later, after Bill Clinton repealed the Act in 1999. Repealing Glass-Steagall led to a huge surge in subprime mortage market growth and dominance, and it is the belief of many that repealing the act was the key factor in todays subprime mortage crisis, threatening to plunge the world into yet another Great Depression. Ignoring the reasons behind the passing of the Act, and the history behind it, could prove a fatal mistake for the US economy. Hence, failing to look to the past has proved to be a great mistake, and should not be repeated. History should not be allowed to repeat itself. The past not only is inseperable from the future, but in fact determines it. Understanding our roots and preserving cultural heritage is key in establishing our values and the way we act. Our past is an integral part of our identity, governing everything we do and circumscribing our future. We often make decisions based on our values, such as deciding not to travel overseas because of the Chinese value of filial piety to parents. If we lose track of our heritages and traditions, we lose part of ourselves, especially our values and and beliefs. This is becoming even more important in our increasingly Westernised world, as Asian values and traditions are being swept up and pushed away by Western popular culture. Traditional, family-based Asian values are immensely significant to establishing our Asian identity, and maintaining our community spirit and thus, national pride. This is a factor that many Singaporeans tend to forget, and one of the key thrusts in improving National Education is to establish a greater sense of Asian values in our young. Our past determines our values; our values determine how we act; our actions determine our future. Neglecting our past is equivalent to depriving our future, and confining it to random, commercialised values from the present. This could very well be a horrible and appalling reality, and should not be allowed to happen. The past and the future are not two seperate entititesthey are merely relative perceptions of the same thing. Failing to recognise the importance of either one is a deadly mistake, and warnings from the past definitely cannot be ignored. The importance of preserving our cultural heritage and identity is also inimitably tremendous in our increasingly globalised world, and thus, it is completely untrue that there is no point in preserving the past. Looking to the future is, in fact, looking to the past.