Alcohol intoxication and edgar allan poe’s ‘the haunted palace’

It is unfair to immediately conclude something of a song because as is normal noush poetry, such is give to various comments. While common adaptations of Poes The Haunted Palace seem to assert confirmedly that the poesy describes somebody last with tuberculosis, this particular interpretation seems to be very faulty in umteen aspects because it is an interpretation that concretizes the al needy cover images in the poesy.In poetry, emotions and abstractions atomic number 18 concretized using visible images, in which case, the interpretation of any human race of poetry should be parasitic on the emotions that these concrete images convey and not on the additional concrete images that kindle be gleaned for the existing imagery in the rime, otherwise, this would cause ambiguity in the schooling. This is what happened with the tuberculosis interpretation another concrete image was read into the already concrete imagery in the numbers. It would be wise to cater another reading of the poem, in this case, it has to be argued that instead of the tuberculosis interpretation a more accurate reading of the poem would be to think alcohol intoxication, after all, other than rightful(prenominal) the images in the poem, the author, Poe was also given to alcoholism after the various tragedies in his life.To start this argument, it would first be best to postulate why the previous interpretation of expiration by tuberculosis is faulty. The reason for this faultiness is that an initial global reading of the poem was applied, and some of the finer details were disregarded in favor of the general reading. To illustrate these further, take for instance the passage, Through which came menstruuming/A fold of echoes,/ whose sweet duty was save to sing (27-30) most readers interpret this as blood spit, however, there is nothing in these tenors that present an image of angiotensin-converting enzyme coughing out blood these lines are more accurately alludin g to somebody who is tal mogul gibberish, hence, the follow-up lines, In voices of surpassing beauty,/the wit and wisdom of their king (31-32)Most readers interpret this as being psyche who is coughing up blood, but if read again carefully, the lines actually speak of psyche who is incomprehensible, talking without wit and wisdom. (32)Another instance in the poem where a faulty reading is made is with the fifth stanza, this stanza is actually where the haunting begins in the poem because this stanza dialog about how the monarch (34) dies. There are readings of the poem that interpret this as the plague that killed the monarch (34), however, if the lines are perused slowly, no such plague can be read into the poem.Others would argue that, But evil things, in robes of gloominess (33) personify the sickness of the king, but if this line is dissected it has to be discover that what is being referred to here are things (33), perhaps to mock the integrity of those whom this line is i ntended and these things (33) are in robes of sorrow (33) the only ones who wore robes during the era of valor were knights and other nobility.These lines show how faultily the poem was taken by those who interpreted it as being the description of a head or someone dying with tuberculosis.Moving on, the next step would be to fortify the argument that, indeed, the poem is about drunkenness. There are whiley details in the poem that point this particular subject matter out.Initially, let us consider the general theme of the poem reading through it, it may be interpreted to be about someone who was initially a man of the people, and eventually, after succumbing to alcoholism, becomes introvert, depressed, and isolated from society. The death in the poem may be interpreted not as physical death but the death of a particular aspect of a human person, such as his social affiliations, his sanity, or his soul. This is validated in the end of the poem as will be explained in detail short ly.To begin the discussion of the poem and alcoholism, let us first consider the narrative of the poem which is shown in the first three stanzas. In these stanzas, which are mostly descriptions of the palace, various allusions are noticed.For instance, in the second stanza, Banners yellow, glorious, golden/on its roof did float and flow (9-10) as opposed to the common interpretation of this being representative of the nordic hair of the king in the poem, a more accurate interpretation would come from the prude tradition.Yellow ribbons have their logical arguments in the English Civil struggle when members of the Puritan Army of English Parliament wore yellow ribbons. This is also the origin of the yellow-ribbon-tied-around-a-tree tradition which represents waiting for someone.Therefore, these passages may just just allude to the Puritan background of the poem, or perhaps, to the fact that the occupant of the palace is waiting for someones return.The parenthesized lines, (This-al l this-was in the olden/Time pertinacious ago,) (11-12) So, with these lines, it is easily conclude that the occupant of the palace has been waiting for someone for a very long time, which perhaps could be the reason for the development of melancholy, Along the ramparts plumed and pallid,/A winged odor went away.(15-16) The spirits (14) in the third stanza do not refer to the ghost that we might suppose them to be, but to actual persons just as it might be used in the idiomatic construction there was not a single soul in cud.It is clear from the three stanzas of the narrative of the poem that there is nothing that dialog about tuberculosis or death. These first three stanzas simply set the tone for a paradox as the poem progresses. The poem is a mini story and as such, it has all the elements of a piece of prose, only rendered in poetry. The images are very vivid and it is quite affect that anyone would interpret it as something else more than just what it is actually saying.