Face to Face Communication Versus Computer Mediated Communication

character to Face Communication versus Computer Mediated Communication In the twenty-first century we are now sustentation in, the rapid advancement of applied science has completely changed our lives, especially the tools we use to communicate. In the olden days where collect mail is wholeness of the popular ways in communicating, pile would sort of choose act stage to display case because it is the only way that could physically maintain their relationship as they roll in the hay see the facial expressions and tree trunk gestures shown by the person who conveys the sum to them.Even now, some slew still favor reflection to depend interaction over estimator liaise dialogue because of the miss of non verbal cues in figurer liaise confabulation. However, with the invention of unhomogeneous information processing system negociate tools, people have dismantletually replaced it with organization to shell communion without them realizing because apparently th e inventions of Facebook, Twitter, Skype and many to a greater extent serve a more convenient platform for people to communicate.Windows 7 Check Your UnderstandingAlthough confront to subject communication is a better way to convey messages and feelings to each other, ready reckoner mediated communication crystallizes our lives much easier. The first difference that distinguishes between computing device mediated communication and face to face communication is the effectiveness. Nowadays, nearly of us are very much depending on various social networking sites, for use the most familiar one- Facebook and Skype to enable us to communicate with people living on the other side of the world and even those who live taut by.Using calculating machine mediated communication for the purposes of interpersonal communication is a common tool for those who live a long distance away from one another, however multiple studies excessively show that computer mediated communication is used to communicate with those who live close by or even among family members who live in the same household (Stafford, Kine. & Dimmick, 1999, Wellman 2008). Besides that, computer mediated communication is effective in divergent tasks such(prenominal)(prenominal) as theme generation.Computer mediated communication tools, too known as the group bear system (GSS), provide a structured environment that allows participants in a collaborative team to interact simultaneously and anonymously to generate ideas, make lasts and solve problems (Jessup, Canolly & Tansik 1990). The reason why computer mediated communication is undecomposed in idea generation but not in decision making is that the process of interacting through and through computer mediated communication powerfulness hinder the relationship between the sender and receiver due to the lack of non-verbal feedback and this pass on probably delay in decision making.The lack of non-verbal cues makes perfect perception of emotion s difficult and receivers may attribute more neutral or negative meanings to messages than senders instead. Computer mediated communication lack of cues and that affect the electrical capacity of the messages arousenot be transmitted effectively and that channel is unnatural and less useable and efficient than face to face communication (Draft & Lengel, 1986 Kock, 2004 Kock, et. al 2008). By lacking(p) the cues, one will not be able to fully derive what the other party is trying to communicate.Apart from that, face to face communication is awkward for some people who stay far or overseas to interact face to face with the party they aspiration to see. They will need to run low a long distance to reach the other party who they call for to convey the message to. However, it is effective in convergent tasks such as decision making. Face to face groups are better at decision making than computer mediated communication groups because they can more good reach a consensus at the s ame time victimisation quick verbal and non-verbal feedback (Archee, 1993).Face to face discussion is faster and the feedback facilitated contain both visual and audio cues compared to the slow computer mediated groups due to the lack of non-verbal feedback and the occurring of un acceptedty at others reaction towards their opinions. Face to face remains the most aright human interaction, never replace intimacy and immediacy of people conversing in the same room (Begley, 2004). In addition, computer mediated communication and face to face communication provide different communication speed to people.In computer mediated communication, the message delivery is faster by just direct email or just typewriting inbox message. The speed and tranquilize of typing reduce the time taken in computer mediated interactions and ease the pressure on group members. As a result, the message might fail to deliver to the recipient. When the message is failed to deliver and users cannot depend o n non-verbal cues, there is a higher chance that the am galacticuity will increase, thus creating prospect for miscommunication.Therefore, it is not a good idea to send urgent messages through computer mediated communication because sometime the receiver might not check his/ her mail frequently or the internet happens to be ingest will lead to miscommunication. Whereas for face to face communication, people need to ordain time to meet up with the person whom they want to convey the message to. This will veritablely delay the time for the meeting if they couldnt regard a suitable time to match with each others schedule. The receivers can instant feedback with clear verbal and non-verbal cues.Face to face communication allows participants to accurately observe both verbal and non-verbal of others. Subtle but heavy nuances such as voice inflections, hand gestures and facial expressions just dont come across in an email message (McFerran, 2010). muckle will receive the feedback from the receiver on the spot without waiting for days and months. This is also enables the participants to adjust their communication according to the feedback. There is also a big difference in the terms aspect between face to face communication and computer mediated communication.People save the cost and effort of be activeling and assembly everyone in the same place at the same time. They can contact each other by using computer mediated programs such as Skype, Facebook, Twitter and so on. Skype is also one of the computer mediated programs that allows face to face communication by using the webcam function. People can see each other and interact by using the application of Skype. Therefore, those who stay far away from each other and wish to have face to face interaction, they can communicate using Skype which provides both interaction in one shot.Moreover, computer mediated communication has also become one of the most cost effective ways of conducting moving ines such as online boutique, online shopping store, online booking and so on. This enables those online companies to save the monthly fees such as rental fees, the salary for employees, water and electricity bills and so on. Additionally, customers can also order or comment about the services or products of those online companies via email. This is convenient for both the customers and also the companies as the companies will know the feedback provided by the customers by just checking their mailbox.For instance, the company can save the traveling cost for craft purpose as they can reply their customers feedback through email. This shows that implementing computer mediated communication systems in organization will mainly advance the efficiency and cost. Besides, it is costly for those people who want to travel to a certain place if they want to meet with his or her friends, family or even relatives. It requires overpriced higher cost of travelling fees such as bus tatter , taxi fees, air line ticket and so on especially during those important festivals or celebrations.Furthermore, this is also time consuming and causing the person to be exhausted throughout the long journey if he or she girdle far away from the destination. Also, the person who conducts the business using face to face communication will need to pay for the business travelling fees. tally to the report by Harvard Business Review Analytic Services, most of the people reported their companies have instituted business travel restrictions, including limitations on the frequency of travel (57%), on the cost of airline tickets (57%) and in accommodation (51%).This shows that face to face communication causes a large amount of cost for the business travelling and thats the reason why the company implements this kind of restriction. Nevertheless, face to face communication even causes people to spend the cost more the actual amount they have to pay to. For example, if there is something confused out durin g the gathering or meeting, the person must travel to meet up once again and this requires cost and time. This might caused a big impact if that is an important issues missed out during the meeting with the client from other country who carries an important business for the company.Also, the most important is it is hard to arrange the time to meet up as it is hard to match with each others schedule. The business cannot conduct smoothly and it will indirectly affect the performance of the company. In a nutshell, face to face interaction and computer mediated communication have their own benefits and majority of the people has known it. However, undoubtedly, computer mediated communication has already replaced face to face interaction without anybody realizing and its the most convenient tool to communicate with each other.Although it is hard to deny that face to face is also an alternative way for humans communication, computer mediated communication has becoming more and more power ful and and to be the major tool for our communication purpose. Thats why people nowadays often communicate using computer mediated communication which is an easiest way to stay connected with each other no theme who come from different part of the world. References An,Y-J. & Frick, T. (2006). Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-mediated communication in face-to-face courses.Journal of computer-mediated communication. Vol. 11 (2) Bordia,P. (1997, January). Face-to-face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication A Synthesis of the data-based Literature. Journal of Business Communication. Vol. 34 (1) Lee. C. (2010). Face-to-face Versus Computer-mediated Communication Exploring Employees Preference of impressive Employee Communication Channel. International Journal for the Advancement of Science & Arts. Vol. 1 (2) Mc. Ferran. J (2010, November 12). Face to Face Communication Still Best Way to clear Job Done.In Winnipeg Free Press. Retrieved February 25,2013, from http//www. wi nnipegfreepress. com/business/face-to-face-communication-still-best-way-to-get-job-done-111714554. html Managing Across Distance in Todays Economic Climate The value of face-to-face communication. In Harvard Business Review. Retrieved February 25, 2013. From http//hbr. org/hbr-main/resources/pdfs/marketing/15426_HBRAS_BA_Report. pdf Perry, M. (2010, April). Face-to-face Versus Computer Mediated Communication Couples ecstasy and Experience Across Conditions ( Masters Thesis)